that's where me and you have different opinion
Miki harassed at work, knows the Nakahara, ultimately it is the sole support for her in that terrible environment, they fall in love and then out of nowhere because of a ridiculous lie and a framework of very poorly made her "friend" ends with their courtship. hence the Seiji and begins to help Miki like the "second Nakahara" since he did not care for it properly before and he becomes the hero of the story and ends up with Miki at the end while the Nakahara just alone without have done nothing wrong to deserve losing Miki
NOT REALLY and this is how you see the story from your point of view. the drama alone is NOT based on nakahara and miki only. there are other important characters involved. ignoring the actors and who is our favourite or not, if you see the story from this point of veiw and only this, of course we will be biased towards nakahara.
OK, nakahara saved her at the begining. we both know that both of them never communicated properly in what actually is going on in their work place together at all. even though when she was going to say to him why she wants to quit the job, she did not get the chance. not to mention, nakahara has not stopped any of abuse and bully that was going on with miki in anyways. the only thing that makes nakahara stands out more is that he started liking miki. that's all. if you saw he has done, please let me know because it seems i have not seen nakahara actually stands up for miki and defends her when she needed. unlike seiji when he stood up to yukiko when she accused her and wanted her out.
i don't deny the fact that nakahara is truely in love miki and wants to be with her and protect her in anyway. i believe his words when he said them. also he is man enough to admit that he hurt the most important person in his life and his morals tells him that he should take responsibilty for what he did (tachibana's condition in here). but unfortunately he still has not proved his words to miki yet.
if it's about "fairness" then nakahara and seiji are on equal positions when it comes to miki. nakahara gave her emotional support by making her feel loved and supported. seiji as the same time, still give her support in his unique ways. everyone is different in how they support people and in so many times you are so unaware of that support but realise later on that it was for one's benefit. but both seiji and nakahara are totally in different place at work therefore can give their support to miki in different ways.
when i keep saying that your opinion of jun/naohito keep making your thoughts biased is because throughout your posts, you insist in making nakahara 100% good and he is a better person because it is fair as he was sole saver of nakahara? but on what basis? i admit, i really like the love between nakahara and miki and feel like his love for her was making her stronger in her work. but in term of dealing with her bully, it did not effect her much. she still could not fight it properly and ended up wanting to quit.
but in seiji's case, when i see him harsh on her and pretending to ignore the bullies, is because i feel he wants her to get strong and fight her way up. he is NO WAY "second nakahara". i saw his helpful side to miki waaaaaaaaaaay before nakahara came into picture with that call. as someone said before, he is her boss. unlike nakahara.
again, nakahara and seiji's character are totally different. seiji being more expereinced in this job, has different way of dealing with problems. i also said this before too. you can't miss all those caring vibes that is coming from seiji and say he does not care. therefore, if you miss all these about his character, i have to suspect that other factors are getting mixed up in your character analysis.
if it is about fairness, then we need to be fair too and give them equal chances. of course is matter of opinon and evryone has their own and i do too. but sometimes we need to see a story from different points of view to be able to construct and fair opinion
great talking to you. as always